|
|
||||||||||||
|
Abstract This paper focuses on optimisation of energy gains for various types of supplementary installed optical structures on photovoltaic modules. The project is based on real measurements using modified Flash Tester Unit and theoretical calculations based on modified equations describing the intensity of incident rays. A standard flash tester unit was modified to enable measurements using various spectrum, incident angle and variable composition between direct and ambient intensity while the homogeneity and precision was preserved. In similar way, the conventional equations used for calculations of incident rays on surface of photovoltaic module were modified to describe the angle and surface of optical structures supplementary installed on photovoltaic modules. Various parameters are used for trimming of the optimisation process. Influence of the optical structure can have either positive impact on produced energy or negative impact while negative or positive impact on light pollution in the surrounding urbanized or populated areas. The main goal is to improve and verify photovoltaic system in real conditions with real light pollution effect defined by the model buildings with integrated renewable energy sources. The system can be later used in general installations on commercial or residential buildings. Key words: Photovoltaic modules, optical structures, light pollution.
References [1] J., Nelson, The physics of solar cells, London Imperial College Press, 2003. [2] R., Kladiva,, Dlouhodobe sledovani parametru fotovoltaickych panelu, Brno. 2013. [3] A. L., Fahrenbruch, R. H., Bube, Fundamentals of Solar Cells. Academic Press Inc., New York. 2016. [4] M., Libra, V, Poulek., Solarni energie. CZU Praha, 2005. [5] M., Belik, Weather dependent mathematical model of photovoltaic panels. ICREPQ, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj15.438 [6] L., Cerna, A Simple Method of Evaluating Thermograms of Photovoltaic Modules. Proceedings 31st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. Hamburg, 2015. [7] Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), December 2006. INTERNATIONAL IEC STANDARD 61025 Second edition 2006-12. [8] S. Halko, O. Suprun and O. Miroshnyk, "Influence of Temperature on Energy Performance Indicators of Hybrid Solar Panels Using Cylindrical Cogeneration Photovoltaic Modules," 2021 IEEE 2nd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek), Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2021, pp. 132-136, https://doi.org/10.1109/KhPIWeek53812.2021.9569975 [9] M. Belik, O. Rubanenko, “Determination PV Module Technical Condition,” Proc. 19 th International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’21), RE&PQJ, Volume No.19, September 2021, pp.604–608. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj19.360. [10] F., Chiacchio, F. Famoso, F.; D’Urso, Dynamic Performance Evaluation of Photovoltaic Power Plant by Stochastic Hybrid Fault Tree Automaton Model. Energies 2018, 11, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020306 [11] M. Belik, Evaluation of long term degradation process of monocrystalline Si photovoltaic panels, Proc. 18 th International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’20), RE&PQJ, Volume No.18, June 2020, pp.551–555. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj18.431. [12] A. Garrod, F. Barrara, Reliability Analysis of Residential Photovoltaic Systems Proc. International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’11) Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain), 13th to 15th April, 2011, pp.1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj09.594. [13] A., Sayed, M.; El-Shimy, Reliability, Availability and Maintainability Analysis for Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Systems. Energies 2019, 12, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071213
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||