ree&pqj2

 
Experimental analysis of the hydrodynamic performance in four configurations of gravitational vortex turbines

Laura Velásquez(1), Rubio-Clemente A(1,2), Chica E.(1)

1. Grupo de Investigación Energía Alternativa, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia, UdeA, Medellín, Colombia.

2. Escuela Ambiental, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Medellín, Colombia.

ftf

2026-02-15

im5

Abstract

In this study, an experimental evaluation of fourgeometric configurations of gravitational vortex turbines was conducted. The configurations result from the combination of two types of inlet channels: a tangential and a spiral, and two types of discharge chambers: a cylindrical and a conical one. The models were fabricated at laboratory scale and tested in a hydraulic test bench under controlled conditions. The configuration combining a spiral inlet channel and a cylindrical discharge chamber exhibited the highest hydraulic efficiency of 60.85%. These tested geometric configurations can be used for distributed generation.

Key words: Gravitational vortex turbines, distributedgeneration, renewable energy, hydraulic efficiency.

Published in: Renewable Energies, Environment & Power Quality Journal (REE&PQJ)
ISSUE: Vol. 25. No. 2 Pages:156-160
E-ISSN: 3020-531 X Date of Current Version: 2026-02-01
REF: 526 Issue Date: 2026-02-15
DOI:10.24084/reepqj25-526 Publisher: AEDERMACP/ EA4EPQ

References

[1] H. Jie, I. Khan, M. Alharthi, M. W. Zafar, and A. Saeed, “Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development,” Utilities Policy (2023), Vol. 81, p. 101490.

[2] S. Agrawal and R. Soni, Renewable Energy: Sources, Importance and Prospects for Sustainable Future, in Energy: Crises, Challenges and Solutions, (2021), pp. 131-150.

[3] I. Alotaibi, M. A. Abido, M. Khalid, and A. V. Savkin, “A comprehensive review of recent advances in smart grids: A sustainable future with renewable energy resources,” Energies (2020), Vol. 13, No. 23, p. 6269.

[4] J. Wang and W. Azam, “Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries,” Geoscience Frontiers (2024), Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 101757.

[5] L. Velásquez, A. Rubio-Clemente, and E. Chica, “Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Vortex Profiles in Gravitational Water Vortex Hydraulic Turbines,” Energies (2024), Vol. 17, No. 14, p. 3543.

[6] A. Kyawo, M. I. Khan, S. I. Chowdhury, and S. Rahaman, “Assessing the Feasibility of Gravitational Vortex Turbines for Sustainable Energy Production in Remote Hilly Areas of Bangladesh,” Journal of Energy Research and Reviews (2023), Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 45-55.

[7] L. Velásquez, A. Posada, and E. Chica, “Optimization of the basin and inlet channel of a gravitational water vortex hydraulic turbine using the response surface methodology,” Renewable Energy (2022), Vol. 187, pp. 508-521.

[8] J. Betancour, F. Romero-Menco, L. Velásquez, A. Rubio-Clemente, and E. Chica, “Design and optimization of a runner for a gravitational vortex turbine using the response surface methodology and experimental tests,” Renewable Energy (2023), Vol. 210, pp. 306-320.

 
logos0
 
br

| Main | Articles | Publication-Regulations | Committees | Publication-Ethics | Open-Access | Fees | Background |

REE&PQJ is edited by:

European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ/AEDERMACP)

ICREPQ

Copyright © 2025 EA4EPQ All rights are reserved