| |
Experimental determination of the temperature coefficient of resistance of ACSR conductors using a radial conductor model |
Ankit Soni(1,2), Jordi-Roger Riba(1), Manuel Moreno-Eguilaz(1) and Josep Sanllehí(2)
1. Department of Electrical Engineering, AMBER High-Voltage Laboratory, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Campus de Terrassa (Spain)
2. SICAME Spain, Sant Esteve Sesrovires (Barcelona)

2026-02-15
|
 |
Abstract
Transmission conductors used in overhead power lines are typically helically stranded and often have a steel core to
give the conductor mechanical strength and outer strands of aluminium or aluminium alloy to provide the current carrying
capacity. The presence of a magnetic core has several effects on the behaviour of the conductors, such as the presence of an axial component of the magnetic field which interacts with the current of the different layers of conductive strands wound helically around the magnetic core. This has a major effect on the alternating current (AC) resistance of the conductor, which can be very different from the direct current (DC) resistance. When applying dynamic line rating (DLR) approaches, the surface temperature of the conductor is typically measured due to the inability to measure inside the conductor, but the average temperature determines the true value of the resistance. In this work, a thermal model of the conductor is used to account for the radial temperature distribution to more accurately determine the resistance of the conductor and the temperature coefficient of the resistance. The experimental results presented show the potential of the proposed method.
Key words: ACSR conductors, temperature resistance, DLR applications, AC resistance.
Published in: Renewable Energies, Environment
& Power Quality Journal (REE&PQJ) |
| ISSUE: Vol. 25. No. 3 |
Pages: 270-274 |
| E-ISSN: 3020-531 X |
Date of Current Version: 2026-02-01 |
| REF: 546 |
Issue Date: 2026-02-15 |
| DOI:10.24084/reepqj25-546 |
Publisher: AEDERMACP/ EA4EPQ |
References
[1] P. Castro, R. Lecuna, M. Manana, M. J. Martin, and D. Del Campo, “Infrared Temperature Measurement Sensors of
Overhead Power Conductors,” Sensors 2020, Vol. 20, Page 7126, vol. 20, no. 24, p. 7126, Dec. 2020, doi:
10.3390/S20247126.
[2] J.-R. Riba, Y. Liu, and M. Moreno-Eguilaz, “Analyzing the role of emissivity in stranded conductors for overhead
power lines,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 159, p.110027, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.IJEPES.2024.110027.
[3] R. S. Singh, S. Cobben, and V. Cuk, “PMU-Based Cable Temperature Monitoring and Thermal Assessment for
Dynamic Line Rating,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 36,no. 3, pp. 1859–1868, Jun. 2021, doi:
10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3016717.
[4] R. Minguez, R. Martinez, M. Manana, D. Cuasante, and R. Garañeda, “Application of Digital Elevation Models to
wind estimation for dynamic line rating,” vol. 134, no. August 2021, p. 107338, Jan. 2022.
[5] A. Moradzadeh, M. Mohammadpourfard, I. Genc, Ş. S. Şeker, and B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, “Deep learning-based
cyber resilient dynamic line rating forecasting,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 142, p. 108257, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.IJEPES.2022.108257.
[6] J.-R. Riba, “The Role of AC Resistance of Bare Stranded Conductors for Developing Dynamic Line Rating Approaches,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 19, p. 8982, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/APP14198982.
[7] J.-R. Riba, “Radial Thermoelectric Model for Stranded Transmission Line Conductors,” Sensors, vol. 23, no.
November 2023, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23229205.
[8] S. Bustamante et al., “Thermal behaviour of mediumvoltage underground cables under high-load operating conditions,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 156, pp. 444–452, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2019.04.083.
[9] Cigré 345, “Alternating current (AC) resistance of helically stranded conductors.” Cigré, Paris, pp. 1–59, 2008.
[10] IEEE Std 738-2012, “IEEE Standard for Calculating the Current-Temperature of Bare Overhead Conductors,” New
York, USA, 2012. doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2013.6692858.
[11] Y. Liu, J.-R. Riba, M. Moreno-Eguilaz, and J. Sanllehí, “Analysis of a Smart Sensor Based Solution for Smart
Grids Real-Time Dynamic Thermal Line Rating,” Sensors 2021, Vol. 21, Page 7388, vol. 21, no. 21, p. 7388, Nov.
2021, doi: 10.3390/S21217388.
[12] Cigré Working Group 22.12, “Thermal behaviour of overhead conductors,” Cigré, Paris (France), 2002.
[Online]. Available: https://e-cigre.org/publication/207-thermal-behaviour-of-overhead-conductors
[13] International Electrotechnical Commission and IEC, “IEC TR 61597:2021 Overhead electrical conductors -Calculation methods for stranded bare conductors,” IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. Accessed: Oct. 27, 2021.
[Online]. Available: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/61412
[14] D. Douglass, “Radial and axial temperature gradients in bare stranded conductor,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol.
1, no. 2, pp. 7–15, 1986, doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.1986.4307928.
[15] B. S. Howington, L. S. Rathbun, D. A. Douglass, and L. A. Kirkpatrick, “AC resistance of ACSR — magnetic and
temperature effects,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., vol. PAS-104, no. 6, pp. 1578–1584, 1985, doi:
10.1109/TPAS.1985.319175.
[16] R. A. Meyberg, F. M. Absi Salas, L. A. M. C. Domingues, M. T. Correia de Barros, and A. C. S. Lima, “Experimental study on the transformer effect in an ACSR cable,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 119, p. 105861, Jul. 2020, doi:
10.1016/J.IJEPES.2020.105861.
[17] IEC, “IEC 60287-1-1:2023. Electric cables - Calculation of the current rating - Part 1-1: Current rating equations
(100 % load factor) and calculation of losses - General.” IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 38, 2023. [Online].
Available: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/68118
[18] T. A. Association, Aluminum Electrical Conductor Handbook, Third. Washington DC, USA, USA: The Aluminum Association, 1989. Accessed: May 12, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.aluminum.org/aluminum-electricalconductor-
handbook
|
|