Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase Shift and Extended Phase Shift Modulations in Dual Active Bridge Converters for Fast EV Charging

Mohamed R. Farid(1, 2), Ahmed L. Elrefai(1, 3) and Sobhy M. Abdelkader(1, 4) 1. Electrical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria, Egypt 2. Electrical Engineering Department, Benha Faculty of Engineering, Benha University, Benha, Egypt 3. Electrical Power Engineering Department, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt 4. Electrical Engineering Department, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura, Egypt 2026-02-15

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparisonbetween Single-Phase Shift Modulation (SPSM) and Extended Phase Shift Modulation (EPSM) in Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converters, focusing on their switching losses, performance, and efficiency under various load conditions. The analysis is conducted using SPICE-based simulations to evaluate the converters' behaviour under low, medium, and high-loading conditions. The DAB converter is designed for fast-charging electric vehicle (EV) applications with the design specifications of 5 kW, 800V/400V employing Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs with switching frequency of 100 kHz. The comprehensive comparative analysis of the two modulation strategies yields critical insights regarding their appropriateness for various applications and operational scenarios, which is fundamental to achieving efficient high-power DC-DC conversion in advanced electric vehicle fast charging systems.

Key words: EV fast charging, DAB, Silicon carbide devices, Single Phase Shift, Extended Phase Shift.

References

[1] M. Safayatullah, M. T. Elrais, S. Ghosh, R. Rezaii, and I. Batarseh, “A Comprehensive Review of Power Converter Topologies and Control Methods for Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 40753–40793, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166935.

[2] F. S. Zehgeer, A. Haque, S. Mateen, and N. Shah, “Review of the Isolated Dual Active Bridge Converter Topologies for the Fast and Ultra-Fast Charging of Electric Vehicles,” in 2023 11th National Power Electronics Conference (NPEC), Dec. 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/NPEC57805.2023.10384974.

[3] E. L. Carvalho et al., “Extended ZVS-On/ZCS-Off Range for CF-DAB Converter Under DCM Operation for Residential Energy Storage Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 119231–119243, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3327219.

[4] N. Noroozi, A. Emadi, and M. Narimani, “Performance Evaluation of Modulation Techniques in Single-Phase Dual Active Bridge Converters,” IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc., vol. 2, pp. 410–427, 2021, doi: 10.1109/OJIES.2021.3087418.

[5] B. Zhao, Q. Song, W. Liu, and Y. Sun, “Overview of Dual-Active-Bridge Isolated Bidirectional DC–DC Converter for High-Frequency-Link Power-Conversion System,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 4091–4106, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2289913.

[6] F. Xu, J. Liu, and Z. Dong, “Minimum Backflow Power and ZVS Design for Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 474–484, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3156159.