ree&pqj2

 
Optimizing MBR Performance: CFD and Experimental Insights on
Aeration Design for Fouling Control

S. Khakpour, F. Nocera, S. Mauro, A. Latteri, C. Tosto and L. Saitta

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, via Santa Sofia 64, 95123 Catania (Italy).

 

ftf

2026-06-27

im5

Abstract

The optimization of membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems is a critical challenge in mitigating membrane fouling. To overcome this issue, a two-phase experimental–computational approach was applied to evaluate the effect of the distance between the aeration pipe and the membrane module on antifouling performance. In the first phase, flat-sheet membranes were fabricated by the NIPS (Non-solvent Induced Phase Separation) method and characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), pure water flux (PWF), and contact angle measurements. Among the prepared membranes, M2 membrane exhibited the highest PWF of 134 L·m⁻ ²·h⁻ ¹, the lowest contact angle of 80.0°, and a more favourable pore size distribution. In the second phase, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to simulate the hydrodynamic conditions around the selected membranes (M2). Increasing the distance improved the uniformity of shear stress distribution across the membrane surfaces. D2 = 60 mm was identified as optimal, as it allowed the system to utilize its full filtration potential while experiencing lower surface friction, thereby reducing fouling. D2 = 60 mm results in the lowest average shear stress (~0.30 Pa), provides the most balanced stress regime, minimizing localized abrasion while maintaining sufficient shear for antifouling, and thereby supporting longer membrane lifespan.

Key words: Membrane, CFD, MBR, Fouling.

Published in: Renewable Energies, Environment & Power Quality Journal (REE&PQJ)
ISSUE: Vol. 26. No.1 Pages: 1-7
E-ISSN: 3020-531 X Date of Current Version: 2026-06-27
REF: 200-26 Issue Date: 2026-07-15
DOI:10.24084/reepqj26-200 Publisher: AEDERMACP/ EA4EPQ

References

[1] P. Krzeminski, L. Leverette, S. Malamis and E. Katsou, “Membrane bioreactors – a review on recent developments in
energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects”, Journal of Membrane Science (2017). Vol. 527, pp. 207-227.

[2] F. Meng, S. Zhang, Y. Oh, Z. Zhou, H. S. Shin and S. R. Chae, “Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review”,
Water Research (2017). Vol. 114, pp. 151-180.

[3] M. Wu, Y. Chen, H. Lin, L. Zhao, L. Shen, R. Li, Y. Xu, H. Hong and Y. He, “Membrane fouling caused by biological
foams in a submerged membrane bioreactor: mechanism insights”, Water Research (2020). Vol. 181, 115932.

[4] M. Wu, M. Zhang, L. Shen, X. Wang, D. Ying, H. Lin, R. Li, Y. Xu and H. Hong, “High propensity of membrane fouling
and the underlying mechanisms in a membrane bioreactor during occurrence of sludge bulking”, Water Research (2023). Vol. 229, 119456.

[5] M. Yang, D. Yu, M. Liu, L. Zheng, X. Zheng, Y. Wei, F. Wang and Y. Fan, “Optimization of MBR hydrodynamics for
cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM design”, Bioresource Technology (2017). Vol. 227, pp. 102-
111.

[6] T. J. Rector, J. L. Garland and S. O. Starr, “Dispersion characteristics of a rotating hollow fiber membrane bioreactor:
effects of module packing density and rotational frequency”, Journal of Membrane Science (2006). Vol. 278, pp. 144-150.

[7] K. Xiao, S. Liang, X. Wang, C. Chen and X. Huang, “Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor
applications: a critical review”, Bioresource Technology (2019). Vol. 271, pp. 473-481.

[8] R. W. Samstag, J. J. Ducoste, A. Griborio, I. Nopens, D. J. Batstone, J. D. Wicks, S. Saunders, E. A. Wicklein, G. Kenny and J. Laurent, “CFD for wastewater treatment: an overview”, Water Science Technology (2016). Vol. 74, pp. 549-563.

[9] X. Guo, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, P. Li and C. Ma, “Numerical and experimental investigation for cleaning process of
submerged outside-in hollow fiber membrane”, Water Science Technology (2017). Vol. 76, pp. 1283-1299.

[10] Y. Shi, Z. Wang, X. Du, B. Gong, V. Jegatheesan and I. U. Haq, “Recent advances in the prediction of fouling in
membrane bioreactors”, Membranes (2021). Vol. 11, 381.

[11] S. J. Poormohamadian, H. Koolivand, M. Koolivand-Salooki and M. Esfandyari, “Numerical modeling of wastewater
treatment using hollow fiber membrane contactors based on the stiff spring method”, South African Journal of Chemical
Engineering (2022). Vol. 40, pp. 21-31.

[12] M. Bulgarini, A. Della Torre and A. Baricci, “Computational Fluid Dynamic Investigation of Local Flow-Field Conditions in Lab Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells to Identify Degradation Stressors and Performance
Enhancers”, Energies (2024). Vol. 17, 3643.

[13] M. Yang, Y. Wei, X. Zheng, F. Wang, X. Yuan, J. Liu, N. Luo, R. Xu, D. Yu and Y. Fan, “Hydraulic optimization of
membrane bioreactor via baffle modification using computational fluid dynamics”, Bioresource Technology (2014). Vol. 175, pp. 633-637.

[14] N. V. Ndinisa, A. G. Fane, D. E. Wiley, D. F. Fletcher, “Fouling Control in a Submerged Flat Sheet Membrane System: Part II—TwoPhase Flow Characterization and CFD Simulations”, Separation Science and Technology (2006). Vol. 41, pp. 1411-1445.

[15] M. Brannock, Y. Wang and G. Leslie, “Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation”, Water Research (2010). Vol. 44, pp. 3181-3191.

[16] M. Brannock, G. Leslie, Y. Wang and S. Buetehorn, “Optimising mixing and nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling and experimental validation”, Desalination (2010). Vol. 250, pp. 815-818.

[17] S. M. Mohan, S. Nagalakshmi, “A review on aerobic selfforming dynamic membrane bioreactor: formation, performance, fouling and cleaning”, Journal of Water Process Engineering (2020). Vol. 37, 101541.

[18] S. Zhang, K. Yang, W. Liu, Y. Xu, S. Hei, J. Zhang, C. Chen, X. Zhu, P. Liang, X. Zhang, X. Huang, “Understanding the mechanism of membrane fouling suppression in electroanaerobic membrane bioreactor”, Chemical Engineering Journal (2021). Vol. 418, 129384.

[19] B. Wang, K. S. Zhang and R. W. Field, “Novel aeration of a large-scale flat sheet MBR: a CFD and experimental
investigation”, AIChE Journal (2018). Vol. 64, pp. 2721-2736.

[20] B. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Fang, K. Zhang and R. W. Field, “Aeration pipe design for free bubbling hydrodynamic
optimization of flat sheet MBRs”, Journal of Membrane Science (2022). Vol. 646, 120222.

[21] Q. Wu, X. Yan, K. Xiao, J. Guan, T. Li, P. Liang and X. Huang, “Optimization of membrane unit location in a full-scale
membrane bioreactor using computational fluid dynamics”, Bioresource Technology (2018). Vol. 249, pp. 402-409.

[22] F. Cortés-Juan, B. Balannec and T. Renouard, “CFDassisted design improvement of a bench-scale nanofiltration
cell”, Separation and Purification Technology (2011). Vol. 82, pp. 177-184.

[23] S. Khakpour, Y. Jafarzadeh and R. Yegani, “Incorporation of graphene oxide/nanodiamond nanocomposite into PVC ultrafiltration membranes”, Chemical Engineering Research and Design (2019). Vol. 150, pp. 60-70.

[24] M. Sayadi, S. Khakpour, Y. Jafarzadeh, “Effects of PMMAPEG Copolymer on the Structure and Performance of PVC Membranes for Oily Wastewater Treatment”, International Journal of Chemical Engineering (2025). 8183253.

 
logos0
 
br

| Main | Articles | Publication-Regulations | Committees | Publication-Ethics | Open-Access | Fees | Background |

REE&PQJ is edited by:

European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ/AEDERMACP)

ICREPQ

Copyright © 2026 EA4EPQ All rights are reserved