ree&pqj2

 
A Novel Method for Optimizing Offshore Substation Installation and
Commissioning for Offshore Wind Projects

Antonio Martín-Aparici, Paula Bastida-Molina, Elías Hurtado-Pérez, César Berna-Escriche

Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética (Institute for Energy Engineering), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia,
(Spain)

 

ftf

2026-06-27

im5

Abstract

Renewable energy, particularly offshore wind projects, has been a key focus for utility companies and developers over the past 15 years [1]. Organizations with extensive experience in power generation have increasingly pursued the concept of harnessing energy from marine environments. While the capital investment for offshore wind farms is significantly higher than for other power generation installations of similar capacity, studies indicate that wind resources in some regions offer greater stability and higher energy yield, enhancing long-term viability and efficiency [1].

The risks in the offshore wind projects can affect the construction, commissioning, operation, and maintenance, and directly impact the viability of a profitable business case. Consequently, adopting a robust methodology that systematically accounts for these risks is critical to ensuring the project’s financial sustainability.

Therefore, the purpose is to identify risks during an important part of the installation and commissioning of offshore wind projects and develop a methodology to mitigate them. Based on the risk identification, this methodology explores the different phases of the project where the mitigations can be implemented to avoid any future delay in the project. The method proposes mitigations depending on different factors, such as weather, environmental conditions, seasons of the year, logistic availability, and other factors that affect the success of the project.

Results indicate areas of time improvement during the activities of the project, due to logistical enhancements, environmental mitigation, and commissioning completion in different timelines of the project, an approach unprecedented in this sector, and help to develop offshore wind energy.

Key words: Offshore wind farm, Mechanical and Electrical installation (M&E), Offshore substation, Risk Mitigation, Weather downtime.

Published in: Renewable Energies, Environment & Power Quality Journal (REE&PQJ)
ISSUE: Vol. 26. No.1 Pages: 37-42
E-ISSN: 3020-531 X Date of Current Version: 2026-06-27
REF: 215-26 Issue Date: 2026-07-15
DOI:10.24084/reepqj26-215 Publisher: AEDERMACP/ EA4EPQ

References

[1]        R. Satymov, D. Bogdanov, and C. Breyer, “Techno-economics of offshore wind power in global resolution,” Appl. Energy, vol. 393, p. 125980, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2025.125980.

[2]        N. Gatzert, T. K.-R. and S. E. Reviews, and undefined 2016, “Risks and risk management of renewable energy projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks,” ElsevierN Gatzert, T KosubRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016•Elsevier, Accessed: Sep. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116001337

[3]        M. Mehta, M. Zaaijer, and D. Von Terzi, “Drivers for optimum sizing of wind turbines for offshore wind farms,” Wind Energy Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 141–163, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.5194/WES-9-141-2024,.

[4]        E. Feijóo Lorenzo, D. Villanueva Torres, M. Bošnjakovi, M. Katini, R. Santa, and D. Mari, “Wind Turbine Technology Trends,” Applied Sciences-Basel, 2022, Accessed: Jan. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178653

[5]        N. O. and A. A. N. W. S. N. D. B. C. US Department of Commerce, “National Data Buoy Center”.

[6]        K. Gunn and C. Stock-Williams, “Development and validation of a regional-scale high-resolution unstructured model for wave energy resource characterization along the US East Coast,” Renew. Energy, vol. 136, pp. 500–511, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.101.

[7]        Z. Yang, G. García Medina, V. S. Neary, S. Ahn, L. Kilcher, and A. Bharath, “Multi-decade high-resolution regional hindcasts for wave energy resource characterization in U.S. coastal waters,” Renew. Energy, vol. 212, pp. 803–817, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.100.

[8]        N. Guillou, “Estimating wave energy flux from significant wave height and peak period,” Renew. Energy, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 1383–1393, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.124.

[9]        W. W. Olney, “Cabotage sabotage? The curious case of the Jones Act,” J. Int. Econ., vol. 127, p. 103378, Nov. 2020, Accessed: Jan. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022199620300933

[10]      BOEM/Revolution project, “Revolution Wind Farm Construction and Operations Plan | Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.” Accessed: Apr. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/revolution-wind-farm-construction-and-operations-plan


 
logos0
 
br

| Main | Articles | Publication-Regulations | Committees | Publication-Ethics | Open-Access | Fees | Background |

REE&PQJ is edited by:

European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ/AEDERMACP)

ICREPQ

Copyright © 2026 EA4EPQ All rights are reserved