Damage diagnosis for offshore fixed wind turbines

D. Agis, Y. Vidal, and F. Pozo

2019/07/15

Abstract

This paper proposes a damage diagnosis strategy to detect and classify different type of damages in a laboratory offshore-fixed wind turbine model. The proposed method combines an accelerometer sensor network attached to the structure with a conceived algorithm based on principal component analysis (PCA) with quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).
The paradigm of structural health monitoring can be undertaken as a pattern recognition problem (comparison between the data collected from the healthy structure and the current structure to
diagnose given a known excitation). However, in this work, as the strategy is designed for wind turbines, only the output data from the sensors is used but the excitation is assumed unknown (as in
reality is provided by the wind).
The proposed methodology is tested in an experimental laboratory tower modeling an offshore-fixed jacked-type wind turbine. The obtained results show the reliability of the proposed approach.

Published in: Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ, Nº. 17)
Pages: 366-370 Date of Publication: 2019/07/15
ISSN: 2172-038X Date of Current Version:2019/04/10
REF: 313-19 Issue Date: July 2019
DOI:10.24084/repqj17.313 Publisher: EA4EPQ

 

Authors and affiliations

D. Agis1, Y. Vidal1, and F. Pozo1
1. Mathematics Department, Control, Modeling, Identification and Applications,Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Campus Diagonal-Besòs, Barcelona (Spain)

Key words

Damage diagnosis, structural health monitoring, wind turbine.

References

[1] P. Tchakoua, R. Wamkeue, M. Ouhrouche, F. Slaoui-Hasnaoui, T. A. Tameghe, and G. Ekemb, “Wind turbine condition monitoring: Stateof-the-art review, new trends, and future challenges,” Energies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2595–2630, 2014.
[2] F. Pozo, Y. Vidal, and ´O. Salgado, “Wind turbine condition monitoring strategy through multiway pca and multivariate inference,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 749, 2018.
[3] F. Pozo and Y. Vidal, “Damage and fault detection of structures using principal component analysis and hypothesis testing,” in Advances in Principal Component Analysis, pp. 137–191, Springer, 2018.
[4] L. Mujica, J. Rodellar, A. Fernandez, and A. G¨uemes, “Q-statistic and t2-statistic pca-based measures for damage assessment in structures,” Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 539–553, 2011.
[5] L. Mujica, M. Ruiz, F. Pozo, J. Rodellar, and A. G¨uemes, “A structural damage detection indicator based on principal component analysis and statistical hypothesis testing,” Smart materials and structures, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 025014, 2013.
[6] F. Pozo, I. Arruga, L. E. Mujica, M. Ruiz, and E. Podivilova, “Detection of structural changes through principal component analysis and multivariate statistical inference,” Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 127–142, 2016.
[7] Y. Wang, X. Ma, and P. Qian, “Wind turbine fault detection and identification through pca-based optimal variable selection,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2018.
[8] P. F. Odgaard and J. Stoustrup, “Gear-box fault detection using timefrequency based methods,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 40, pp. 50–58, 2015.
[9] R. S. Ryback, M. J. Eckardt, R. R. Rawlings, and L. S. Rosenthal, “Quadratic discriminant analysis as an aid to interpretive reporting of clinical laboratory tests,” Jama, vol. 248, no. 18, pp. 2342–2345, 1982.
[10] G. Zonta, G. Anania, B. Fabbri, A. Gaiardo, S. Gherardi, A. Giberti, N. Landini, C. Malag`u, L. Scagliarini, and V. Guidi, “Preventive screening of colorectal cancer with a device based on chemoresistive sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 238, pp. 1098–1101, 2017.
[11] M. Q. Zhang, “Identification of protein coding regions in the human genome by quadratic discriminant analysis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 565–568, 1997.
[12] L. Zhang and L. Luo, “Splice site prediction with quadratic discriminant analysis using diversity measure,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 21, pp. 6214–6220, 2003.
[13] A. Arcos Jim´enez, C. Q. G´omez Mu˜noz, and F. P. Garc´ýa M´arquez, “Machine learning for wind turbine blades maintenance management,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 13, 2017.
[14] F. Pozo and Y. Vidal, “Wind turbine fault detection through principal component analysis and statistical hypothesis testing,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 3, 2015.
[15] E. Zugasti Uriguen, Design and validation of a methodology for wind energy structures health monitoring. PhD thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2014.
[16] A. Tharwat, “Linear vs. quadratic discriminant analysis classifier: a tutorial,” vol. 3, p. 145, 01 2016.
[17] J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, The elements of statistical learning, vol. 1. Springer series in statistics New York, NY, USA:, 2001.
[18] F. J. Massey Jr, “The kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness of fit,” Journal of the American statistical Association, vol. 46, no. 253, pp. 68–78, 1951.