|
|
||||||||||||
|
Abstract Over the last twenty years, Brazil has experienced significant changes in its electric energy matrix, notably with the expansion of wind and solar energy sources. In the early 2000s, hydroelectric plants with a capacity of 70 gigawatts (GW) were responsible for generating 90% of the country's electricity, while solar and wind sources contributed merely 1%. Today, the scenario has evolved, with wind and solar energy comprising approximately 25% of the national generation, indicating a departure from the previous hydro-dominated matrix. This research aims to apply specific types of neural networks to multivariate data to forecast Brazil's wind power generation capacity, providing insight into the potential for future energy strategies. This research contributes as a as a decision support tool contemplating relevant information for analysts, researchers, and participants in the renewable energy market. The monetary volume destined to import key components of the wind, considering specific time lags, was utilized to forecast the Installed capacity of the wind farms in Brazil. The Toda-Yamamoto Causality Tests revealed unidirectional Granger causality in the sense of the Import variable for the Brazilian Installed Capacity variable for wind energy production. Another result obtained was the finding that the variable that matters most in the multivariate configuration of the Neural Network is the variation in Installed Capacity in megawatts, followed by the import volume of wind energy components, which exhibited critical lags at 3 and 6 months. Key words: Renewable Energy; Wind-Solar Growth; Neural Network Forecasting.
References [1] Abreu, F. (2002). A Crise Do Setor Elétrico, 1999 - 2001 – O Racionamento De Energia. Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Rio De Janeiro Departamento De Economia. [2] Oliveira, R. (2011). Caderno de Educação Ambiental e Mudanças Climáticas. Governo de São Paulo. Disponível em: <https://smastr16.blob.core.windows.net/cpla/2013/03/MudancasClimaticas.pdf>. Acesso e: 25 jun. 2023. [3] GOUVEA, M. A. S.; SILVA, J. E. A. A história da energia eólica no Brasil: do pioneirismo à maturidade. Revista Brasileira de Energia, v. 29, n. 4, p. 44-53, 2018. [4] Absolar - Associação Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica. Disponível em: < https://www.absolar.org.br/>. Acesso em 21 jun. 2023. [5] Lage, E. S., & Processi, L. D. (2013). Panorama do setor de energia eólica. BNDES. Disponível em: https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/2926/1/RB%2039%20Panorama%20do%20setor%20de%20energia%20e%C3%B3lica_P.pdf. Acesso em> 21 jun. 2023. [6] Irena (2022), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2021, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. [7] Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. [8] Uzair, M., & Jamil, N. (2020). Effects of hidden layers on the efficiency of neural networks. In 2020 IEEE 23rd international multitopic conference (INMIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [9] Marques, M. L. V., & dos Santos, D. R. (2023). A Bibliometric Study on the Nexus of Economic Growth and Renewable Energy in Brazil. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 15(4). [10] Hu, H., Xue, W., Jiang, P., & Li, Y. (2022). Bibliometric analysis for ocean renewable energy: An comprehensive review for hotspots, frontiers, and emerging trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112739. [11] Li, G., & Shi, J. (2010). On comparing three artificial neural networks for wind speed forecasting. Applied Energy, 87(7), 2313-2320. [12] Li, S., Wunsch, D. C., O'Hair, E. A., & Giesselmann, M. G. (2001). Using neural networks to estimate wind turbine power generation. IEEE Transactions on energy conversion, 16(3), 276-282. [13] Brekken, T. K., Yokochi, A., Von Jouanne, A., Yen, Z. Z., Hapke, H. M., & Halamay, D. A. (2011). Optimal energy storage sizing and control for wind power applications. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2(1), 69-77. [14] Basheer, I. A., & Hajmeer, M. (2000). Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of microbiological methods, 43(1), 3-31. [15] Ramchoun, H., Ghanou, Y., Ettaouil, M., & Janati Idrissi, M. A. (2016). Multilayer perceptron: Architecture optimization and training. [16] Panchal, G., Ganatra, A., Kosta, Y. P., & Panchal, D. (2011). Behaviour analysis of multilayer perceptrons with multiple hidden neurons and hidden layers. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 3(2), 332-337. [17] Murtagh, F. (1991). Multilayer perceptrons for classification and regression. Neurocomputing, 2(5-6), 183-197. [18] Garson, GD. (1991). Interpretando pesos de conexão de rede neural. Especialista em Inteligência Artificial. 6(4):46-51. [19] Goh, ATC. (1995). Redes neurais de retropropagação para modelagem de sistemas complexos. Inteligência Artificial na Engenharia. 9(3):143-151. [20] Gevrey, M., Dimopoulos, I., Lek, S. (2003). Revisão e comparação de métodos para estudar a contribuição de variáveis em modelos de redes neurais artificiais. Modelagem Ecológica. 160:249-264.
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||