|
|
|||||||||||
|
Abstract The increase of renewable energies in the currentlandscape makes Dynamic Line Rating (DLR) of transmission and distribution lines very meaningful to drive the production of these renewable energies. In order to be able to operate the lines dynamically, even in emergency situations, it is necessary to know the behaviour of the cables in detail. In particular, this study focuses on the dynamic management of high-voltage insulated cables. The main objective of this work focuses on the development of a model based on the Finite Element Method (FEM) to obtain the temperature reached by the cable conductors under different operating conditions. The FEM model was developed and validated by monitoring the current and temperature of a high-voltage insulated transmission line in operation. As a result of this FEM model, it was possible to obtain the temperature reached by the conductors in different scenarios in which the current flowing through the cables was higher than 900A. In addition, FEM model scenarios were developed where the line was operated close to its maximum load to test its behaviour. Key words: Cable monitoring, dynamic rating, finiteelement method, high-voltage insulated cable, transient thermal analysis.
References [1] P. Ocłoń, “The effect of soil thermal conductivity and cable ampacity on the thermal performance and material costs of underground transmission line,” Energy, vol. 231, pp-120803, 2021. [2] P. Wang, “Optimization for thermal rating method of high voltage cable considering the existence of air gap,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 217, pp-109151, 2023. [3] H. Zhao, Z. Zhang, Y. Yang, P. Gan and X. Liu, “Real-time reconstruction of temperature field for cable joints based on inverse analysis,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 144, 108573, 2023. [4] IEC 60287-1-1:2023 Electric cables – Calculation of the current rating - Part 1-1: Current rating equations (100 % load factor) and calculation of losses – General, 2023. [5] IEC 60853-2:1989 Calculation of the cyclic and emergency current rating of cables. Part 2: Cyclic rating of cables greater than 18/30 (36) kV and emergency ratings for cables of all voltages. [6] H. Zhao, Z. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Yang and Z. Dong, “Thermal Analysis of Power Cable in Tunnel Considering Different Laying Conditions,” in 2022 6th International Conference on Power and Energy Engineering (ICPEE), pp. 152-157, 2022. [7] X. Xu, Q. Yuan, X. Sun, D. Hu and J. Wang, “Simulation analysis of carrying capacity of tunnel cable in different laying ways,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 130, pp. 455-459, 2019. [8] J. C. del-Pino-López and P. Cruz-Romero, “A 3D parametric thermal analysis of submarine three-core power cables,” Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ), vol. 18, pp. 363-368, 2020. [9] J. Bengoechea, T. Sarto and J. Neimann-Larsen, "Optical System for Underground Cable Maintenance, Mixed Lines Fault Discrimination and Underground Cable Fault Location," in 10th International Conference on Insulated Power Cables (JICABLE), pp. 1-6, 2019. [10] Lumiker, Monitorización de corriente CAMOS200. Available at: https://www.lumiker.com/downloads/lumiker-camos200.pdf (Accessed: 10 October 2023). [11] Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, 2023 R1. [12] IEC TR 62095:2003 Electric cables – Calculations for current ratings – Finite Element method, 2003. [13] IEC 60287-3-1:2017 Electric cables – Calculation of the current rating – Part 3-1: Operating conditions – Site reference conditions, 2017. |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||